It is interesting that many Western teachers pay a great attention to Multiple Intelligences. It is rather unusual phenomenon in comparison with Kazakh teachers. I don’t wonder even if there are teachers, who know nothing about these intelligences. I am sure that those, who know, do not take it seriously. After visiting Birmingham Grid for Learning and passing their MI test, I found out following intelligences in myself. My highest score is Intrapersonal, and it means that I am 100% myself smart. Next comes my visual/spatial intelligence, it equals to 25 out of 25. It is, definitely, like me, because sometimes I try to remember a thing or story drawing a picture in my head. It helps me a lot to remember necessary things I don’t want to forget. If I plan to do something, I imagine these tasks in a form of pictures. Sometimes, my one day actions form the whole museum of pictures.

The same happens with numbers: trying to remember one’s mobile phone number or service code numbers, I associate them with something I know well. For instance, I used this technique to remember 622047. I transferred it to the following sentence “Zhulduz is in bus #47”. (Recoding works like this: Zhulduz is my student, who lives in Room 622 and bus#47 is the bus that dorm students use most of all.) That’s why my logical intelligence stands before my interpersonal abilities, which are followed my kinesthetic and linguistic intelligences. The MI test proved again that I am not musical at all, and it is true. I can listen to music and that is only thing I can do with it. The results of MI test satisfied my curiosity about my multiple intelligences and I find them reliable to use in the classroom. It is ok to use it with our students, but it will be more interesting if a teacher tries to define her students’ MI by simple observation in a span of several weeks and later to compare own results with MI results. It is my point, however, I trust, but I always check it.

If you want to define the intelligences you possess follow the link
http://www.bgfl.org/bgfl/custom/resources_ftp/client_ftp/ks3/ict/multiple_int/questions/choose_lang.cfm

MI test is interesting even for us, adults, and that was the main reason for me to read MI Basics thoroughly. Reading the theory, we meet MI and IQ terms several times. As I have noticed these two terms compete with each other trying to prove importance of only one.
It becomes obvious from “MI theory challenges the notion of IQ in at least three significant ways. MI maintains that: (1) several intelligences are at work, not just one; (2) intelligence is expressed in our performances, products, and ideas, not through a test score; and (3) how the intelligences are expressed is culturally defined.”

MI test is a tool to define our MI, IQ is a tool to measure our MI.
We use different intelligences at a time. Concerning potential isolation, I think that it is impossible to isolate our intelligences from each other, they work well, when they work together. The problem of autism is very essential in MI. Yes, it is true, sometimes we see a boy, who is good at Maths, etc., but he is not so talkative at all. I define it as a process, where some intelligences are actively working, while others keep remaining passive and even come to die. What I like most about MI theory I read is explanation of all eight intelligences we possess. If you take MI test, and define your MI, you can read more about it (them) in the theory. You will ,definitely, get deeper understanding of your abilities after reading MI Basics.

Advertisements